INTRODUCTION
The burn wound causes both local and systemic effects mediated by the host
responses of inflammation, regeneration, and repair. Initial physiological derangement
can give rise to shifts in fluids, electrolytes and proteins within body compartments
necessitating formal fluid resuscitation in large burns. Other gross
metabolic, endocrine, hematological and immunological disturbances can also
occur in these patients. The severity of burn injury depends on the etiology of the
injury, the percentage body surface area of skin damage and the depth of the burn.
The aim of burn wound management is to achieve early sound and durable healing.
The management of the burn wound is only one part of the management of
the burn patient as a whole.
ANATOMY
Depth of burn injury is divided into partial and full thickness skin loss, with
partial thickness burns being divided into superficial and deep types (Fig. 4.1).
This classification quantifies the amount of tissue damage into anatomical terms.
1. Erythema (1st degree burns)—involving the epidermis only, usually with
no blistering although desquamation can occur later on.
2. Partial thickness (2nd degree burns)—involves epidermis and varying
portion of dermis.
3. Superficial if sparing of significant proportion of hair follicles, sebaceous
and sweat glands and substantial portion of dermis.
4. Deep if destruction of large proportion of hair follicles, sebaceous and
substantial portion of dermis.
5. Full thickness (3rd degree burns)—destruction of epidermis, dermis
and all adnexal structures.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The initial local effect of a burn injury can be divided histologically into three
differential zones of tissue damage and blood flow.
1. Zone of necrosis—tissue necrosis centrally due to destruction of tissue
by injury.
2. Zone of ischemia—surrounds zones of necrosis and can progress and
lead to a clinically apparent increase in the area of skin necrosis or depth
of injury.
3. Zone of inflammation (hyperemia)—surrounds zone of ischemia and
is manifested by increased vascular permeability with extravasation of
fluid from the intravascular to the interstitial space leading to edema.
The extravasation of water, electrolytes and macromolecules is immediate
and can be generalized in larger burns. It continues for 24-48 h
and if left untreated can lead to hypovolemic shock.
ESCHAR
The necrotic tissue resulting from a burn is known as eschar. It separates slowly
from underlying viable tissue and is a good substrate for microorganisms. If left
untreated it becomes colonized, contaminated and eventually infected. Infection
attracts white blood cells that can digest the interface and cause separation of the
eschar from the underlying viable tissue. Topical antimicrobial agents increase the
time to eschar separation.
ASSESSMENT OF THE BURN WOUND
The burn wound must be assessed clinically before a treatment plan can be
formulated. The following must be determined; the depth of the burn wound, the
size of the burn and the anatomical site of injury.
1) Depth of burn determined by clinical wound inspection and the pinprick
test (Table 4.1)
2) Size of the burn determined as percent of total body surface area
(%TBSA) using
a) Wallace’s “Rule of Nines” (Fig. 4.2)—useful for initial rapid estimation
b)
c) Patient’s palm ~ 1% of their body surface area—useful for children
and smaller burns
Note: Children have larger heads and smaller limbs in terms of body surface
area compared to adults.
3) Anatomical Site—important functional and aesthetic areas include;
hands, feet, face, eyelids, perineum, genitalia, and joints. These areas
need special attention to optimize wound healing and prevent cosmetic
and functional problems secondary to hypertrophic scaring.
INITIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE BURN WOUND
Resuscitation, smoke inhalation and other injuries must be dealt with initially.
Maintenance of the airways, breathing and establishing venous access are paramount
and are discussed in other chapters. Following assessment of the burn
wound the following practical procedure may be required:
1) First Aid—cooling the burn wound soon after the injury (within 30
minutes) is beneficial in removing heat from the wound and limiting
tissue damage. It can also reduce early edema and protein extravasation.
Care must be taken, as prolonged or excessive cooling can be detrimental.
Irrigating the wound in a drench shower for a least 20 minutes
is essential in chemical injury.
2) Burn Blister—management is controversial with evidence of blister fluid
having both beneficial and deleterious effects. In general they should be
removed if large, over joints and produce functional impairment. Small
intact blisters can be left in situ to act as a biological dressing.
3) Escharotomies—required if circumferential full thickness burns of chest,
limbs or digits are present. In limbs/digits such burns impair circulation
and cause distal ischemia. Circumferential full-thickness chest burns
can restrict chest wall excursion and impair ventilation. Such burns require
mid-axial escharotomies performed either at bedside or in the
operating room. A scalpel or electrocautery device can be used to incise
through the full thickness burns down to bulging fat. The incisions
should extend into adjacent nonburned or less deeply burned tissue.
Since the wounds are full thickness, minimal analgesia or anesthesia is
required, but extension into less damaged tissue can be very painful.
The decision to perform escharotomy is a clinical one. If you think that a wound
may need an escharotomy-then do it! This is particularly relevant if an excision of
the clearly full-thickness wound will be done later. An escharotomy incision will
only improve outcome without risk of harm in that situation. Waiting for signs of
distal ischemia or absent pulses is too late!
Mixed depth full thickness/deep partial thickness injuries producing a similar
clinical picture can be treated with topical collagenase although this is not really a
substitute for formal escharotomies.
BURN WOUND HEALING
The amount of anatomical tissue destruction and the size of the injury are
important determinants of wound healing.
1) Erythema (1st degree burns) usually resolves without any untoward effect
within a few days.
2) Superficial partial thickness (2nd degree burns) wounds heal spontaneously
by re-epithelialization from epidermal remnants within two weeks
and leave few or no scars.
3) Deep partial thickness (2nd degree burns) wounds heal by a mixture of
granulation, wound contraction and epithelialization from epidermal
remnants and the wound edge. If left to heal spontaneously these wounds
take 2-4 weeks or longer to heal and are associated with a high incidence
of disfiguring hypertrophic scarring and scar contracture. These
wounds often need skin grafting.
4) Full thickness wounds (3rd degree burns) require surgical intervention
and split thickness skin grafting. This invariably leads to hypertrophic
scarring particularly at the edges of the grafts (marginal hypertrophy).
If left to heal spontaneously these wounds granulate, contract and epithelialize
from the wound margins. This process is prolonged, leaves
the wound susceptible to invasive infection, and leads to significant functional
and esthetic deformity.
5) Burn wounds that require skin grafts have a higher incidence of scar
hypertrophy if the grafting is performed after 14 days of injury and the
wound has no viable dermal elements. Burn wounds that are not going
to heal within two weeks should be debrided and covered with autologous
split skin grafts to minimize hypertrophic scarring.
TREATMENT PLANNING
Once the size, site, and depth of the burn wound have been estimated and
initial urgent measures have been undertaken, a plan of action must be formulated
for further management of the wound. This management plan will include
conservative and surgical options depending on the individual patient and the
type and site of the wound. In the discussion below our preferred options will be
given followed by other alternatives. In general our institution pursues early aggressive
surgical intervention in deeper injury to limit the duration of burn illness
and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.
Treatment planning depends on the assessment of the following factors:
• Patient’s general condition and co-morbid factors
• Patient age
• Burn depth
• Burn size
• Anatomical distribution of injury
MANAGEMENT OF SUPERFICIAL PARTIAL THICKNESS WOUNDS
The aim of management of these types of wounds is to promote rapid spontaneous
re-epithelialization with the minimum number of painful dressing changes,
and to prevent infection which can convert the injury to a deeper one that requires
skin grafting.
SMALL/MEDIUM SIZED SUPERFICIAL PARTIAL THICKNESS WOUND
(<>
Preferred method
Biobrane®
For patients presenting within 24 h of their injury. After admission and stabilization
under sedation or anesthesia the burn blisters are cleaned, debrided and
all burned epithelium is removed. Biobrane® is applied to the wound in a circumferential
fashion around the limb or trunk so that it is tight and closely adherent
to the wound. The Biobrane® is secured by stapling it to itself. Care is taken not to
staple the Biobrane® to the patient as this can cause granulomas and the staples
are painful to remove. The Biobrane® is then wrapped with a standard dressing of
Polysporin/Mycostatin impregnated rolled gauze covered by elastic bandages. The
dressings are removed at 24 h to inspect the wound. Oral antibiotics with staphylococcal
coverage are given for seven days. If the Biobrane® is adherent after the
first day, no further dressings are required. As re-epithelialization occurs in 10-14
days the Biobrane® spontaneously separates from the healed wound.
If wound infection supervenes, the Biobrane® rapidly becomes nonadherent
and can trap any exudate produced by the wound. For this reason Biobrane® is
not used in patients presenting more than 24-36 h following their injury and in
larger wounds (> 40% TBSA). Biobrane® is also relatively expensive compared to
common topical antimicrobials.
ALTERNATIVE METHODS
Topical antimicrobials
Topical Silvadene (1% Silver Sulfadiazine) is the usual alternative for these
wounds. After cleaning the wound and debridement of the blisters, Silvadene is
applied topically to the wound which is then covered with a rolled gauze and elasticized
bandage. The Silvadene dressings are changed once or twice daily until reepithelialization
occurs and the wound is healed. This method requires frequent
dressing changes, which can be a painful. It is the method of choice for patients
presenting late after injury with a colonized wound.
Biological dressings
Biological dressings such as allograft skin, xenograft skin (porcine), human
amnion can all be used in a similar fashion to Biobrane® to physiologically close
the wound while re-epithelialization occurs. The problems associated with the
use of these products include availability, collection, storage, and transmission of
infection control and cost.
Other dressings
Conventional dressings such as Vaseline gauze or silicone sheet (Mepitel®) can
be used to cover the wound while re-epithelialization takes place. After application,
these dressings need frequent changes, which can be painful. These types of
dressing are useful for small burns (less than 5% TBSA).
Synthetic dressings such as Duoderm®, Omniderm® Tegaderm® and hydrocolloids
have all been used with some success to dress such wounds. Other semisynthetic
biological dressings such as Dermagraft TC® are also being evaluated
for use in this type of wound.
Exposure
After cleaning and debridement, wounds are left open in a warm dry environment
to crust over. The coagulum formed separates as re-epithelialization proceeds
underneath. Advantages of this method are comfort and no need for dressing
changes. Disadvantages of this method include prolonged inpatient treatment,
specialized ward and nursing requirements and higher infection rates. This technique
is now not commonly used apart from the treatment of specialized areas
such as the face, genitalia and perineum.
LARGE SUPERFICIAL PARTIAL THICKNESS INJURY (> 40% TBSA)
Preferred treatment
Allograft
These uncommon injuries are more prone to contamination and infection
and can have a high morbidity. Best results are achieved if allograft is applied
within 24 h of the injury. Under anesthesia the wound is cleaned and all blisters
and nonadherent epidermis removed. Allograft split skin grafts meshed 2:1 are
placed over the open dermal wound and secured with staples. It is important not
to open up the mesh on the allograft as this can lead to desiccation, infection and
deepening of the underlying wound. A standard graft dressing is applied. If the
burn is thought to be a little deeper, a mid-dermal burn. The burn can be debrided
with a dermatome at a depth of 10-15/1000 inch and allograft applied as
above. This wound should then go on to heal spontaneously without incorporation
or rejection of the allograft into the wound.
ALTERNATIVE METHODS
Other biological or semi-biological dressings
Xenograft skin can be used in a similar fashion to the allograft, but does not
usually adhere as well, leaving the wound open to desiccation, infection and pain.
Biobrane® can be used in the same way as for smaller injuries. There is a higher
rate of wound infection which can lead to loss of the Biobrane® and deepening of
the burn wound.
Topical antimicrobials
Topical antimicrobials such as silver sulfadiazine can be used for this type of
wound in a similar manner to that described above. It is the treatment of choice
for wounds that present late and are colonized, as by definition the wounds should
heal spontaneously. The dressing changes can be painful and are an ordeal for the
patient. There is a high incidence of wound sepsis, which can lead to deepening of
the burn wound, which may then necessitate skin grafting.
Other dressing
Simple nonbiological dressings such as Vaseline gauze or silicone sheets
(Mepitel®) can be used to dress the large partial thickness wound. These dressings
can be medicated with an antimicrobial agent. The dressings are covered with
rolled gauze, bulky absorbent pads and elasticized crepe bandages.
The dressings are left intact for three to five days unless wound exudate seeps
through the dressing. The dressing changes can be very painful and often the patient
needs a general anesthetic for the procedure. There is a high incidence of
invasive wound sepsis and deepening of the burn wound that often necessitates
surgery. This technique is not recommended for larger burns.
MANAGEMENT OF DEEP PARTIAL THICKNESS INJURY
(SMALL AND LARGE)
This type of burn has a significant morbidity in terms of time to healing, infective
complications and subsequent scarring. Conservative management leading
to spontaneous healing usually involves prolonged and painful dressing changes
and the resultant scar is invariably hypertrophic leading to cosmetic and functional
debility. Thus an early surgical approach that tries to preserve dermis and
achieve prompt wound healing is preferred.
PREFERRED TREATMENT
Total wound excision and grafting
Burns that are deemed to be deep partial thickness in nature are best tangentially
excised and the wound covered with autologous split skin grafts. The grafts
usually require meshing and the amount of wound that can be closed with autograft
depends on the donor sites available and the mesh ratio used. Cosmetically
and functionally sensitive areas such as the face and hands need thicker sheet
autograft for wound closure. If the burn size is large (20%) or if donor sites are
scarce, then temporary wound closure with allograft, xenograft or other biological
or semi-biological dressings may be required to close the rest of the wound
while the donor sites heal. Standard graft dressings are applied. The grafted areas
can be inspected five days later. Early inspection of the wound is recommended if
there was late presentation or colonization of the excised burn wound. This type
of total wound excision can be done in one stage if enough surgeons are available
or can be done in two or three stages within the first five days following the burn.
Patients with large burns need to return to the operating room for further grafting
when their donor sites are healed. This is usually done on a weekly basis.
ALTERNATIVES
Serial wound excision and grafting
This method is employed for larger burns where donor sites are scarce. The
surgical technique is similar to that given above but the amount of burn wound
excised is the amount that can be covered by meshed split skin grafts from the
available donor sites. Unexcised areas are treated with topical antimicrobials until
donor sites have healed and can be reharvested, usually 7-14 days later. The unhealed
areas of burn wound are susceptible to invasive wound infection before
they are excised and this treatment method has a higher morbidity and mortality
compared to early excision. The use of the topical antimicrobial flamacerium (silver
sulfadiazine and cerium nitrate) has been reported as decreasing episodes of
invasive wound infection, morbidity and mortality with this method of treatment.
Topical antimicrobials
The wounds can be treated with daily or twice daily applications of silver sulfadiazine
until wound healing is achieved. This may take up to 4-6 weeks and
involve the patient in prolonged and painful periods of dressing changes. There is
a higher incidence of invasive wound infection using this method with associated
deepening of the wound. Once healed there is a much higher incidence of hypertrophic
scarring which can be a bother functionally and cosmetically disabling.
This method is usually reserved for patients who are thought to be unfit for surgical
intervention and for smaller burns in functionally and cosmetically unimportant
areas.
FULL THICKNESS INJURY
Full thickness burns will not heal spontaneously unless very small and invariably
require skin grafting. The necrotic tissue usually requires excision and the
resultant wound requires closure to reduce the risks of invasive infection and systemic
sepsis. Prompt excision and wound closure reduces morbidity and mortality
inpatients with such injuries.
1) SMALL FULL THICKNESS INJURY (<>
Preferred method
Excision and autografting
By definition full thickness injuries will not heal spontaneously and require
wound closure with split thickness autografts. On presentation it is usually best to
excise these wounds in a tangential fashion and obtain wound closure with split
thickness autograft. Meshed autograft is used if larger areas need closure, whereas
sheet autograft is used for functionally and cosmetically sensitive areas such as the
hands and face. Grafts are secured to the wounds by staples or absorbable sutures
and are dressed in the standard fashion. Grafts and wounds are inspected on the
second day if the initial wound was infected or heavily colonized or on the fifth
day if not.
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS
Topical antimicrobials
Inpatients who are elderly or unfit for surgical intervention, conservative management
with topical antimicrobials can be used. The antimicrobial agent—usually
silver sulphadiazine—is applied once/twice daily until the burn eschar separates
and a granulating wound is present. This usually takes approximately three
to four weeks to occur and sometimes longer. This granulating wound can then
be covered with autograft to achieve wound closure. In certain cases small wounds
less than 5 cm diameter can be left to heal spontaneously by wound contraction
and epithelialization from the wound margins.
This method of treatment usually results in a higher incidence of invasive wound
sepsis, a longer inpatient stay in the burn unit and a longer time to wound healing.
It is not recommended except in the special circumstances given above.
2) MEDIUM/LARGE FULL THICKNESS INJURIES (> 10% TBSA)
Preferred treatment
Total burn wound excision and auto/allografting
The treatment of choice for medium and large full thickness injuries is total
excision of the burn wound and physiologic wound closure with split skin autograft,
allograft and/or synthetic skin substitutes. This early aggressive surgical
approach has been shown to improve mortality in certain patient groups with
such burns. It is a major surgical undertaking to do this in one sitting with the
larger burns (greater 40% TBSA) and needs a coordinated approach from the
surgical and anesthetic teams. The timing of surgery postinjury is critical as blood
loss in the 24 h postburn has been shown to be half that of surgery after this time
(Table 4.2). In centers when numerous surgeons and anesthetists are not available,
total wound excision can be staged over two to three operations removing
the wound within five days of the injury. The type of wound excision depends on
the state of the burn wound. Those patients presenting immediately following
their injury usually have an uncolonized wound, which can be excised in a tangential fashion with a skin graft knife. Those patients presenting late a few days
after injury will have a colonized or infected wound. Attempts to preserve subcutaneous
fat in these cases usually fail and can lead to invasive systemic sepsis; therefore
fascial excision is usually preferred in these circumstances.
Wound closure is performed with meshed split thickness skin autograft and
allograft if donor sites are insufficient. In large and massive burns special techniques
such as overlay grafting are used to cover large wound areas with widely
meshed autograft. After total wound excision the whole wound must be physiologically
closed with auto- or allograft or a synthetic skin substitute like Integra®.
In large burns where wound closure cannot be achieved primarily with autograft,
the patient returns to the operating room when the donor sites are ready
for reharvesting at which time allograft is changed and further autograft is applied.
This is usually done in stages on a weekly basis until the whole wound is
closed with autograft.
ALTERNATIVE METHODS
Serial excision and autografting
This surgical approach has been described above for deep partial thickness
burns and entails excision of as much of the wound that can be covered with
available autograft. The unexcised areas of burn are treated with topical antimicrobials
until the donor sites are ready to be reharvested. This method of treatment
has a higher morbidity and mortality in larger injuries and has generally
been abandoned.
Topical antimicrobials and autografting of a granulating wound
This approach is again similar to the one described above for deep partial thickness
injury. The wound is dressed on a daily or twice daily basis with a topical
antimicrobial until spontaneous separation of the eschar occurs leaving a granulating
wound. This is then closed with split skin autograft. This technique has a
high incidence of invasive wound infection and systemic sepsis and in larger burns
is associated with a high mortality. It is only suitable for smaller burns inpatients
who are unfit for surgical debridement of the burn wound. It is not recommended for younger, fit patients with larger injuries.
MIXED DEPTH INJURY
Although the descriptions above have alluded to specific depths of burn, in
clinical practice most burns are mixed depth with areas of superficial partial, deep
partial and full thickness injury in adjacent area. Treatment of such wound depends
on the mixture of each component part of the injury, as one will usually
predominate. In general superficial partial thickness areas should be left to epithelialize
while the areas of deeper injury require excision and wound closure.
SURGICAL PLANNING—ANATOMICAL FACTORS
Prior to commencing any operation, the surgeon must have a plan as to which
donor sites are going to be used, which anatomical areas are to be debrided, and
the technique used for debridement. It is essential to have an idea of how much
autograft is required, which areas are priorities for autograft coverage, the required
mesh ratios and where the harvested graft is going.
In smaller burns where donor sites and available graft is plentiful, the focus is
to minimize donor site morbidity and to maximize functional and cosmetic outcome.
Care is used when choosing donor sites, preferentially taking cosmetically
hidden areas such as the upper thighs and scalp. Sheet grafts are preferred. It is
probably unnecessary to use meshed grafts in burns less than 30% TBSA.
In major burns (<>
autograft in the smallest number of operations to maximize survival. In these
size burns, the number of operations required is estimated to be one operation for
every 10% TBSA burned. The sequence of areas to be autografted is variable depending
on the surgeon. In general, our practice is to cover the posterior trunk,
anterior trunk, lower limbs, upper limbs, and head and neck in order. This sequence
maximizes the area covered with autograft early in the course and allows
for earlier ambulation. Areas not covered with autograft have allograft placed,
which is removed when autograft is available at subsequent operations.
MANAGEMENT AND GRAFTING OF ANATOMICAL AREAS
In general sheet grafts should be used whenever possible, however this not
practicable in burns over 30% TBSA. The following considerations need to be
taken into account when grafting each anatomical area especially when mesh grafts
are used as contracture can occur in the line of the interstices.
TRUNK/BREAST
In general mesh graft interstices on the trunk should be placed horizontally.
Care should be taken to preserve the breast or breast bud, especially in females,
and to place enough skin with minimal mesh expansion into the inframammary
folds and the sterna area to try and reduce subsequent breast deformity. The umbilicus
should be preserved if possible.
BUTTOCKS/PERINEUM/GENITALIA
The buttocks are difficult to manage and skin graft take is poor. They are allprone
to fecal soiling and shearing and can be the site of repeated bouts of invasive
wound sepsis. It is often worth autografting them in the first operation, but
graft take can be disappointing. If the grafts fail it is then best to leave the area for
a time when the patient can be nursed prone while the grafts take. This is usually
done after all other areas are healed. It is not usually necessary to perform a colostomy
to prevent fecal soiling.
The perineum and genitalia are usually managed conservatively with grafting
of any unhealed areas later on in the course of surgical treatment.
LOWER LIMB/HIPS/KNEES/ANKLES/FEET
Mesh graft interstices on the lower limbs should run longitudinally along the
line of the limb except at the joints. At both knee and ankle joints graft expansion
should be minimized if possible and the direction of the interstices should be the
same as the axis of rotation of the joint i.e. perpendicular to the longitudinal axis
of the limb.
The skin on the sole of the foot is glabrous skin and is very thick and specialized.
It will commonly re-epithelialize despite what initially seems a full thickness
injury. The sole of the foot is best treated conservatively until it is apparent that
spontaneous re-epithelialization will not occur. In contrast the skin on the dorsal
aspect of the foot is very thin and often requires grafting. It is important not to use
widely meshed skin in this area as any significant hypertrophic scarring can cause
difficulties with weight bearing ambulation and fitting of shoes.
UPPER LIMB/AXILLA/ELBOW
The same principles apply to the upper limb as described above. Mesh interstices
should run longitudinally on the upper limb apart from the axilla and elbow
where the interstices should be parallel to the axis of rotation of the joint. It is
important not to widely expand the mesh over the joints.
HANDS
Great attention to detail must be paid to the hand to achieve optimal functional
results. The volar aspect of the hand is covered with specialized glabrous
skin, which usually heals and it is best to avoid grafting it if possible. The dorsal
skin is thin and usually requires grafting in deep burns. In general, sheet graft is
preferable to mesh graft and is best secured with catgut sutures. There is some
debate as to which way the grafts should be applied to the hand along the longitudinal
axis of the hand or perpendicular to it. There is no good evidence to suggest
one way is better than the other.
The key to functional success is early mobilization of the hand. Initially after
grafting the hand is dressed and splinted in the position of safety with the metacarpophalangeal
joints flexed at 70-90°, the interphalangeal joints at 180°, the wrist
in neutral or slightly extended and the thumb flexed and adducted at the metacarpophalangeal
joint. The grafts are inspected at five days and, if stable, mobilization
can be started. If sheet grafts are used they can be exposed with no dressing
during mobilization during the day with splintage at night.
Inpatients with large burns, repeated application of allograft may be required
until it is time to autograft the hands. It can be very difficult to maintain the
position of safety of the hand during this period with splintage alone especially in
children under two years of age. In these cases K-wires through the metacarpophalangeal
and interphalangeal joints may be required to maintain the safe position
of the hand.
FACE/NECK/EYELIDS
The face and neck are areas that are both cosmetically and functionally important.
Deep burns of the face are usually treated conservatively with either topical
antimicrobials or repeated applications of allograft until a viable wound bed is
present. Occasionally early excision of full thickness facial burns is performed and
allograft applied to prepare the wound bed. Conservative treatment tends to preserve
viable tissue and is preferred. Further application of allograft may be required
before donor sites are available to graft the face. Sheet allograft should be
used and placed on the facial wound in cosmetic units (Fig. 4.3).
Medium to thick sheet split skin autograft should be used for the face and
applied in cosmetic units to place marginal scars in natural skin crease lines. If
available, donor sites should be above the neck for optimum color and texture
match. The scalp is an excellent donor site for grafts destined for the face. To get
suitable sheet grafts, dermocleisis with a solution of epinephrine should be employed
and a powered dermatome with a four-inch guard should be used to get
grafts of maximum width.
The eyelids require special attention to prevent corneal injury. Early excision
and closure of eyelid burns reduces the incidence of corneal injury secondary to
exposure and should be a priority. In the short term temporary tarsorrhaphies
(suturing the upper and lower lids together) can be performed to protect the corneas.
When applying autograft to the eyelids thick split thickness graft should be
used and overcorrection should be performed putting more skin in than seems to
be needed as contraction can lead to corneal exposure. Throughout the course of
the burn injury the corneas should protected by regular application of eye ointment.
3 comments:
As a medical student, I found your research to be very helpful during a class I recently completed. I feel that the assessment of wound care should extend past the healing process, and always include some kind of follow up, such as a critical care test. What are your opinions on this?
This is such a great blog post! Very good information! Appreciating the hard work you put into your site and detailed information you present. It’s awesome blog. Which product you will suggest for the burn wound bcoz when it occur for me. The doctor told me to take collagen products .
A few people pick surgery, infusions or laser treatment to expel them. Rather than paying for costly medicines, there are some basic Keloids Herbal Remedies that you can use to deal with your keloids at home for little cost.
Post a Comment